Showing posts with label beyond search. Show all posts
Showing posts with label beyond search. Show all posts

Monday, 31 January 2011

Search Based Applications and Concept Search


I have not written about search for a while, as my current role is is less involved in search than my previous one, but then a couple of things come along at the same time.


Last week my colleague Martin White, of Intranet Focus, who is a true enterprise search guru, wrote about Search-based Applications. Martin's post was prompted by his review of a new book on Search-based Applications (SBA), but he also briefly mentions some of the latest and greatest in search technology trends, and I am sure he will not mind me quoting him verbatim to get the point across:
"For example, coming to a desktop near you before too long will be search tools based on topic modelling, which use Bayesian statistics and machine learning to infer the relationship between topics in a document.  What is fascinating about this technique is that it dates back to the development of latent semantic indexing in the late 1980s, which was then refined into probabilistic latent semantic indexing a decade later.  Now the buzz is about Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), which itself has formed the basis for correlated topic models (CTM) and dynamic topic modelling (DTM)."
Not that most of us ever thought otherwise, but this is a timely reminder perhaps, that there is more to intranet and enterprise search than the technology built into SharePoint !

It is therefore very timely after Martin's post that another element of search is brought to my attention. Today Clearwell Systems announced that they have extended their "transparent" search capabilities to concept search - to give us Transparent Concept Search

If your not totally clued up on the idea of concept search (how could you not be ?) this is the intro paragraph of the Wikipedia entry as way of brief explanation:

"A concept search (or conceptual search) is an automated information retrieval method that is used to search electronically stored unstructured text (for example, digital archives, email, scientific literature, etc.) for information that is conceptually similar to the information provided in a search query. In other words, the ideas expressed in the information retrieved in response to a concept search query are relevant to the ideas contained in the text of the query."

The emphasis on ideas is mine. Concept Search is obviously applicable to the general ECM landscape (although Clearwell's focus is on e-Discovery). Now I used to be one of the cynics who thought that just slapping (a good) search engine on top of your content was a recipe for disaster. I was (and mostly still am) of the opinion that metadata and information architecture are massively important, BUT could we finally be getting to a place where search engine performance meets the vendor rhetoric ? 

Content Intelligence is a term that has been banded about since at least 2007, if not earlier. The idea is that you can use Business Intelligence concepts and technologies to anlayze your corpus of unstructured information. Will concept search, LDA, CTM and DTM and the rest of the advanced search acronym soup make easy, reliable and therefore highly usable content intelligence available to us all ?

Will real advances in search, added to the application of Moore's law to processing and the availability of 'cheap' storage into the Petabytes and beyond, mean that Information Management and Content Management professionals will finally be able to stop worrying about business classification scheme's, folder structures and metadata and just "throw a search engine on it" ???

Wednesday, 25 March 2009

EMC should bid for Sun !

I have been really busy with on-site client work for a few weeks, and have numerous clients with 31st of March deadlines, busy busy, but I have been wanting to respond to Pie's posting: Documentum and the Search for Search for over a week now.

However then we get the "IBM to buy Sun" bombshell...... :-)

All good fun eh. So I thought I would tackle both issues with one posting. Why ? Well as you can see from the 'provocative' title, I don't think EMC should buy a search engine, I think they should buy Sun Microsystems.

Firstly in direct response to Pie, EMC don't 'need' to buy a search engine, they can put some resource and investment into the open source Lucene search engine, which Pie does mention in his post. Now having said that there are a lots of search engine vendors out there, so there is bound to be some good technology to snap up if they wanted to.

But why not invest more strategically - and buy Sun ? What would they get, well lots of synergistic product lines, and things they dont currently have;
  • Storage: Not just the Sun storage hardware, which may or may not have technology which could add value to EMC's storage products (I am not a storage geek so I don't know), but also software - even Solaris and its ZFS file system
  • Server hardware: Why shouldn't EMC have a line of servers including some serious CPU technology to go with their storage hardware? Sun could be regarded as the progenitor of current cloud computing and its 'big iron' would be great for Mozy and other EMC cloud initiatives.
  • MySQL: All future versions of Documentum developed to run on their own RDBMS platform ? Again I am not a database geek either, but I do know that Oracle is generally considered as the best platform for Content Server, so would MySQL cut the mustard?
  • Java: Well, EMC are "the worlds sixth biggest software company" so why not own Java ?
  • Portal: Either Sun Portal or LifeRay (OK, LifeRay) - a great investment for a full 'soup to nuts' information management environment, a portal to sit over Content Server and CenterStage
Well, I know its probably got a 'cat in hell's chance' of happening as we say in Yorkshire, but its fun to postulate the theory. I did see a tweet yesterday suggesting the author had a good source which had sugested Oracle and HP might put in a joint bid for Sun, HP for the hardware and Oracle for the software. Personally I think it would be better for the industry if Sun's tech was not swallowed by either IBM or HP. As for the software, many are suggesting IBM would not be a good owner for Java - I am not so sure on that front, but you can see why Oracle might want to get its hands on both Java and Solaris.

So, come on EMC, get your cash and impress us all, buy the company and do innovative things with the tech !

Wednesday, 30 July 2008

Beyond Search

So whilst I have not been blogging much lately, every time I get out one of my machines and get into an off-line RSS reader, I am amazed by the prodigous output of Stephen Arnold. Stephen has his own company, Arnold-IT but his blog is 'Beyond Search'.

If you have any interest at all in enterprise search, and you have not already, subscribe to the 'Beyond Search' feed for an excellent distillation of all that is going on, and some very enlightening insights.